In Reply to
:@revdancatt pretty!
In Reply to
:@revdancatt pretty!
In Reply to
:@revdancatt I might need to block all new followers from now on.
In Reply to
:@revdancatt @guardian That is _so much_ nicer and easier to read!
In Reply to
:@revdancatt the moment Web 2.0 turned into Social Media everything went down the drain.
In Reply to
:@revdancatt looks like it works for me, it is rather pretty.
In Reply to
:@revdancatt Did you make it in time?
In Reply to
:@revdancatt I shall keep that in mind for when I’ll manage to cross the channel at some point.
In Reply to
:@revdancatt There were rumors back then in the various backchannels that I frequent. It’s probably more fun not knowing any details.
In Reply to
:@revdancatt Someone must have tossed it.
In Reply to
:@revdancatt @waferbaby apparently: twitter.com/SwiftOnSecurit… But why they linked to it now… ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
#MustRead: How Yahoo Killed Flickr and Lost the Internet | @mat gizmodo.com/5910223/how-ya…
In Reply to
:@revdancatt yeah, it’s suddenly all over Twitter/Facebook/private Slacks. I’m very confused.
In Reply to
:@revdancatt why not? (Also… how did this post from five years ago suddenly surface again?)
In Reply to
:@revdancatt you have much better percentages than I do.
Retweeted revdancatt:
Hoping this becomes a regular feature: theguardian.com/world/live/201… good work @stuheritage & @newsmary
In Reply to
:@revdancatt almost every morning here, too. Another reason why this algorithmic timeline would wreak havoc on my Twitter usage.
Retweeted revdancatt:
When I wake up in the morning & start replying to tweets having misread hours as minutes, “Why yes I’ll jump into this 10h old conversation”
Retweeted revdancatt:
Oh… ffs twitter.com/CBCNews/status…
In Reply to
:@revdancatt the results were very impressive, though. In many ways still the best geo stuff out there.
In Reply to
:@revdancatt as far as I understand it they are getting downtuned until they pass the tests. Which makes them probably very sluggish.
In Reply to
: